SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Del) 4698

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
N.V. RAMAMI – Appellant
Versus
THE GOVERNMENT OF CANADA – Respondent


* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Judgment reserved on: 17.03.2025 Judgment delivered on: 15.05.2025 + CMI 6/2019 & CM APPL. 26975/2019 N.V. RAMAMI .....Petitioner VERSUS THE GOVERNMENT OF CANADA .....Respondent Memo of Appearance For the Appellant: Ms. Sunita Singh and Mr. Abhigya Kushwah, Advocates with petitioner in person For the Respondents: Mr. Amir Singh Pasrich and Mr.Karan Bahmani, Advocates CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ JAIN

JUDGMENT

MANOJ JAIN, J

1. It needs to be evaluated whether appellant can be permitted to file the appeal in question as an indigent person or not.

2. Before coming to the aspect of indigency, let me, in brief, take note of the relevant background facts.

3. Appellant-Mr. N.V. Ramami was employed by Canadian High Commission as Librarian/Typist way back in the year 1975 and was stationed in New Delhi. He, eventually, got promoted as Accounts CMI 6/2019 1 of 17 Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed Officer in the year 1982 and his job profile, inter alia, included handling of cash, bank drafts and cheques of various currencies etc.

4. During such employment, plaintiff-Commission learnt that funds were missing from their accounts and either there w

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top