SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Del) 4729

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Anup Jairam Bhambhani, J
KHUSHI SHARMA – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA – Respondent
W.P.(CRL) 259/2025



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners:Mr. Jayant K. Sud, Sr. Advocate, Mr. Ashish Upadhyay, Mr. Kartik Jasra, Mr. Shivam Jasra, Mr. Prannit Stefano, Ms. Shayal Anand, Mr. Sai Manik Sud, Mr. Sahib Kocchar, Ms. Vidhi Jasra
For the Respondents:Mr. Rohan Jaitley (CGSC), Mr. Dev Pratap Shahi, Mr. Varun Pratap Singh, Mr. Yogya Bhatia, Mr. Rahul Tyagi, ASC (Crl.), Mr. Mathew M. Philip, Mr. Sangeet Sibou, Mr. Aniket Kumar Singh, Mr. N. Hariharan, Sr. Advocate, Mr. Siddharth Yadav, Mr. Sumit Chaudhary, Mr. Anil Mittal, Mr. Shaurya Mittal, Mr. Vipin Kumar, Mr. Sunny Tomer

Police must register an FIR immediately when information discloses a cognizable offence. Failure to do so constitutes a dereliction of duty, warranting judicial intervention.

Headnote:(A) Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 - Section 173 - Judicial precedents on FIR registration - Police remiss in not registering FIR following suspicious death - Judicial mandate requires immediate registration of FIR where cognizable offence is disclosed, irrespective of territorial jurisdiction. (Paras 17, 19, and 25)

(B) Police procedures - A missing person's report should prompt police to assess for possible cognizable offenses; failure to act leads to dereliction of duty. (Paras 11, 36, and 51)

(C) Judicial accountability - The court rebukes officers for loss of evidence due to inadequate action; emphasizes duty to investigate promptly. (Paras 50, and 51.1-51.2)

Facts of the case:
The petitioner seeks justice for her brother, found dead after suspicious circumstances hinted at foul play, leading to a petition for FIR registration due to police inaction. (Paras 1-6)

Findings of Court:
Both Delhi Police and U.P. Police failed to register FIR despite clear need; court orders prompt action for compliance and investigation.

Issues: Whether the Delhi and U.P. Police complied with statutory mandates in registering an FIR after a suspicious death.

Ratio Decidendi: Mandated registration of FIR should occur if information suggests any cognizable offence, necessitating swift investigation without delay for other procedures.

Result: Petition allowed; directives issued for immediate FIR registration by both police jurisdictions.

Table of Content
1. factual background regarding the death of harsh kumar sharma. (Para 1 , 2 , 3)
2. petitioner’s grievance regarding lack of fir. (Para 5 , 6 , 7 , 8)
3. arguments from delhi and u.p. police regarding fir registration. (Para 10 , 11 , 12 , 14 , 15)
4. statutory provisions related to cognizable offences. (Para 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21)
5. court’s interpretation of fir registration requirements. (Para 22 , 23 , 24 , 25)
6. court orders police to register fir and expedite investigation. (Para 51 , 52 , 53)

JUDGMENT

ANUP JAIRAM BHAMBHANI J.

The present petition represents a sister‟s plea for proper investigation into the death of her 20-year-old brother - Harsh Kumar Sharma - who never returned after leaving home in Delhi on the morning of 03.12.2024, only to be found dead late that night in an obscure location in Greater Noida, Uttar Pradesh.

BRIEF FACTS

2. Briefly, the unfortunate episode leading-up to the filing of the present petition has unfolded as follows:

2.1. The petitioner‟s brother left home at about 09:30 hours on 03.12.2024 driving his own car to attend college in Noida, Uttar Pradesh; and when he did not return later that day, the petitioner and her mother tried reaching him on his mobile numbers but with no success despite having made countless calls to him. This led to the petitioner‟s mother calling the PCR on the numbers 100 and 112 at about 19:44 hours on 03.12.2024 to report that her son had gone missing. In response to the call, two police officers from P.S.: Moti Nagar, New Delhi reached the petitioner‟s residence and after making some preliminary inquiries, they asked the family members to come to the police station to lodge a formal complaint, which they did.

2.2. Eventually, the Delhi Police registered a missing person‟s complaint vide GD No. 0143A at about 21:15 hours at P.S.: Moti Nagar, New Delhi. The police subsequently tracked the cell phone location of the petitioner‟s brother, which led them to a service lane, near RCI Hostel, Greater Noida, Uttar Pradesh at about 23:30 hours, where they found the petitioner‟s brother in his car bearing registration number DL-8C-BF-2888, holding the steering wheel but showing no movement. The persons present at the spot broke the side-window of the car, opened it, and pulled-out the petitioner‟s brother.

2.3. The officer from the Delhi Police who was accompanying the petitioner and her family took photographs and video-graphed the car; and upon opening the car found a carbon monoxide cylinder in it. Most importantly, the brother‟s face was red and swollen and there were visible red spots on his body. The petitioner‟s brother was rushed to Kailash Hospital, Greater Noida.

2.4. In the meantime, the brother‟s bag and mobile phone(s) were removed from the car; and in the bag, they found a diary, on the first page of which there was a handwritten note which read : “IF YOU WANT TO MEET THIS PERSON, HE IS DEAD”. The car is stated to have been left at the spot where it was found, as advised by the police.

2.5. The doctors at Kailash Hospital, Greater Noida declared the petitioner‟s brother „brought dead‟ at about 01:00 a.m. on 04.12.2024. Thereafter, the officer from the Delhi Police who was accompanying the petitioner and her family members escorted them to P.S.: Knowledge Park, Uttar Pradesh, where the U.P. Police registered the incident as an unnatural death vide GD No.002 at 01:56 hours on 04.12.2024. The petitioner states that at that point, the police officers at P.S.: Knowledge Park were shown the hand-written note found in the brother‟s diary and they assured the petitioner and her family members that senior officers would investigate the matter.

2.6. On the next day i.e., on 04.12.2024 at about 08:00 hours, the petitioner alongwith her relatives reached Kailash Hospital, where the brother‟s body was kept in the mortuary. S.I. Rahul Kumar and one other police officer from P.S.: Knowledge Park also reached the hospital at about 09:15 hours; they video- graphed the dea

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top