SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Del) 4742

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
EMAAR INDIA LTD – Appellant
Versus
CITRON HOLDING LLP – Respondent


JUDGMENT

1. The present proceedings are instituted under Section 34 of the Arbitration & Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter, referred to as the ‘A&C Act’) thereby seeking setting aside of the arbitral award dated 30.08.2024 (hereinafter, ‘impugned award’) delivered by the Arbitral Tribunal comprising of a Sole Arbitrator (hereinafter, ‘AT’).

2. The Petitioner/builder and Respondent/buyer had entered into two Builder Buyer Agreements, both dated 30.12.2008 and pari materia to one another (hereinafter, ‘BBA’), whereby two commercial properties being i) PSQ C-1-F04-009, Unit no. 409, 4th Floor (commercial section), commercial project “The Palm Square”, Sector 66, Gurugram, Haryana and ii) PSQ C-1-F04-010, Unit No. 410, 4th Floor (Commercial Section), “The Palm Square”, Sector 66, Gurugram, Haryana (hereinafter, ‘subject premises’) were agreed to be sold to the Respondent by the Petitioner.

3. Briefly stated, as per Clause 16(a)(i) of the BBA, the Builder was supposed to deliver possession of the Units to the Claimant/Respondent within 36 months from the execution of the BBA, i.e., by 31.12.2011. There was an additional grace period of 120 days available to the Builder for delivery of p

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top