Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
PRATHIBA M. SINGH, NAVIN CHAWLA, C. HARI SHANKAR, JJ
LALIT SHARMA AND ORS. – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA &ORS. – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. judgment presented through hybrid mode for effective hearings. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. conduct of elections hinges on financial adequacy. (Para 3) |
JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLA JUSTICE C. HARI SHANKAR Prathiba M. Singh, J. (Oral)
1. This hearing has been done through hybrid mode.
CM APPL.30972/2025 (for exemption)
2. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. Application is disposed of.
CM APPL.30971/2025 (for exemption from filing Rs.65,000/-)
3. In the present writ petition, directions have been issued from time to time, in respect of conduct of elections to the Delhi High Court Bar W.P.(C) 10363/2021 Page 1 of 5 Signature Not Verified Signed By:DHIRENDER Association as also the various Bar Associations in the District Courts. Vide order dated 21st February, 2025, finally, elections were fixed for being conducted in all Courts simultaneously on 21st March, 2025.
4. The elections to all the Bar Associations were concluded on 21st March, 2025, except in respect of the Saket Bar Association and the Shahdara Bar Association, which were called off due to various reasons. Accordingly, certain applications were filed in respect of these two Bar Associations which were
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
