SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Del) 4878

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
MRS. VINOD KUMARI BHALLA – Appellant
Versus
MR. ANIL PRAKASH (DECEASED) THROUGH HIS L.RS. & ORS – Respondent


$~52 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of decision: 22nd May, 2025 + CS(OS) 55/2018 & I.A. 2010/2018 MRS. VINOD KUMARI BHALLA .....Plaintiff Through: Mr. Naveen Sharma and Ms. Ayushi Agarwal, Advs.

versus MR. ANIL PRAKASH (DECEASED) THROUGH HIS L.RS. &

ORS .....Defendants Through: Mr. P.N. Gautam & Mr. Shivam Ujjainwal, Advs for D-1(a), (b) & (c)

Ms. Charu Sachdeva, Adv. for D-2 and D-6 with D-6 in person (Ms. Nisha Vats) and Mr. Yuvraj Vats’

SPA Holder of D-2 in person.

Mr. Vaibhav Bharti, Adv. for D-4 (a), (b) & (c) and D-5 Defendant no. 3 since deceased and represented by its legal heirs.

%

CORAM:

HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MANMEET PRITAM SINGH ARORA

J U D G M E N T

MANMEET PRITAM SINGH ARORA, J (ORAL)

1. The present suit has been filed seeking declaration, partition, permanent and mandatory injunction with respect to the property bearing no. C-185, Sarvodaya Enclave, New Delhi, 110017 admeasuring 300 sq. yds.

(‘suit property’).

Signature Not Verified Signed By:HEMANT CS(OS) 55/2018 Page 1 of 12 Brief facts

2. The parties to the suit are the legal heirs of late Sh. Bal Swarup Saxena Kharena (father) and late Smt. Prem Lata (mother).

2.1 It is stated that while the mother of the parties d

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top