SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Del) 4900

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Prateek Jalan, J
SWAPNIL NARAYAN SARAWADE & ORS. – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA THROUGH ITS SECRETARY & ORS. – Respondent
W.P.(C) 12035/2024



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr. T.D. Yadav
For the Respondents: Ms. Shreya Sinha, SPC for R-1, Mr. Amartya A. Sharan, Mr. Akash Kishore

The definition of a Bachelor’s degree under the UGC Act does not include the Sangeet Visharad and similar certifications from non-recognised institutions, rendering those ineligible for the advertised post.

Headnote:This case involves a petition under Article 226 regarding eligibility for the post of Trained Graduate Teacher (TGT) (Music) per the advertisement by NESTS. The advertised qualification mandated a Bachelor’s degree in Music, as defined under Section 22(3) of the UGC Act, which the appellants do not possess. The court determined that while equivalence claims were made, they fall outside the writ court's remit and concluded that the petitioners' qualifications do not meet the required standards. Thus, the writ petition was dismissed.

Table of Content
1. eligibility for tgt post based on qualifications. (Para 1 , 2)

HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALAN PRATEEK JALAN, J. (ORAL)

1. The petitioners have filed this petition under Article 226 of the Constitution, with regard to their candidature for the post of Trained Graduate Teacher [“TGT”] (Music), pursuant to an advertisement issued by National Education Society for Tribal Students [“NESTS”] in the year

2023.

2. By the said notification, NESTS sought to recruit teaching and non-teaching employees for several posts in the Eklavya Model Residential Schools, including 320 posts of TGT (Music). The dispute concerns the essential educational qualification for the said post, which was prescribed as follows:

“Essential Qualification:

A Bachelors Degree with Music from a recognised University/

Institution.”

Signature Not Verified W.P.(C) 12035/2024 Page 1 of 6 Signed By:PARUL

3. The petitioners participated in the written examination and were issued provisional letters of appointment, subject to document verification. After document verification, however, their candidatures were rejected by separate communications dated 24.06.2024, which stated that they did not possess the required educational qualification and were, therefore, ineligible for the said post.

4. I have heard Mr. T.D. Yadav, learned counsel for the petitioners, and Mr. Amartya A. Sharan, learned counsel for NESTS.

5. The petitioners admittedly do not hold qualifications which are termed as Bachelor’s degrees with Music. Their claims that they fulfil the prescribed eligibility conditions, instead originate from certificates recognising them as Sangeet Visharad or Sangeet Prabhakar, issued by institutions of good standing and repute. The certificates have been placed on record and in the case of each of the petitioners, are as follows:

PETITIONER NO. PARTICULAR OF DEGREE INSTITUTION DETAILS
1. Sangeet Visharad Examination – Recognised as Bachelors in Music Akhil Bhartiya Gandharva Mahavidyalaya Mandal, Mumbai, Maharashtra
2. Sangeet Prabhakar & Sangeet Visharad Pracheen Kala Kendra, Chandigarh
3. Sangeet Prabhakar Examination Prayag Sangeet Samiti, Allahbad, UP
4. Senior Diploma Examination/ Sangeet Prabhakar Prayag Sangeet Samiti, Allahbad, UP
5. Sangeet Visharad Pracheen Kala Kendra, Chandigarh
6. Senior Diploma Examination/ Sangeet Prabhakar Prayag Sangeet Samiti, Allahbad, UP
Signature Not Verified W.P.(C) 12035/2024 Page 2 of 6 Signed By:PARUL

6. In support of the contention that these certificates are equivalent to Bachelor’s degrees, the petitioners have placed on record certificates issued by the institutions themselves, stating that their courses are widely recognised and have been granted equivalence by several State Governments and Universities. The Sangeet Visharad qualification, according to the petitioners and the concerned institutions, has been recognised as a Bachelor’s degree in Music.

7. There are two aspects to the qualification mentioned in the advertisement as far as this post is concerned, one is that the candidate must hold a “Bachelor degree with Music”, and second is that the qualification must be “from a recognised university/institution”. It is difficult to accept the petitioners’ case on both these grounds.

8. The petitioners admittedly do not hold the Bachelor’s “degree”, as properly understood. The word “degree” is defined in Section 22(3) of the UGC Act, 1956 [“the Act”], as follows:

“22(3) For the purposes of this section, “degree” means any such degree as may, with the previous approval Central Government, be specified in this behalf by the Commission by the notification in the official Gazette.”

Bachelor’s degrees are included in the notifications issued by the Government under the said section, but the qualifications held by the petitioners are not. The requirement under the advertisement was of a “Bachelor’s degree”. Section 22(1) of the Act limits the right of conferring or gr

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top