SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(Del) 33472

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
AUDERTEC SOLUTIONS LLP – Appellant
Versus
CONTROLLER GENERAL OF PATENTS DESIGNS AND TRADE MARKS & ANR. – Respondent


-

$~(Original)

* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI + C.A.(COMM.IPD-PAT) 3/2021 AUDERTEC SOLUTIONS LLP ..... Appellant Through: Ms. Priya Adlakha, Mr. Bindra Rana, Ms. Rima Majumdar, Mr. Dhruv Mathur and Mr. Swaraj Singh Raghuwanshi, Advs.

Versus CONTROLLER GENERAL OF PATENTS, DESIGNS AND TRADE MARKS & ANR. ..... Respondents Through: Mr. Harish Vaidyanathan Shankar, CGSC, Mr. Srish Kumar Mishra, Mr. Sagar Mehlawat and Mr. Alexander Mathai Paikaday, Advs.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE C. HARI SHANKAR

J U D G M E N T

% 01.03.2024 C.A.(COMM.IPD-PAT) 3/2021

1. The appellant submitted Application No. 202011011938 dated 19 March 2020 for grant of a patent in respect of an invention titled “a method and system for detecting road anomalies” (hereinafter “the subject patent”). The application stands rejected by the Controller of Patents and Designs (“the Controller”) vide order dated 8 January 2021 passed under Section 15 of the Patents Act, 1970. The appellant is in appeal against the said order.

2. The impugned order rejects the application on the ground that Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed the claim in the application suffers from want of inventive step vis-a- vis prior art D-2. Though

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top