SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(Del) 33483

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
SHRI TARUN CHANDER MALIK – Appellant
Versus
M/S VARAHI DIAMONDS AND FINANCE LTD – Respondent


-

$~J-11 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Pronounced on: 04.03.2024 + ARB.P. 1007/2023 SHRI TARUN CHANDER MALIK ..... Petitioner Through: Mr. Amit Sethi and Mr. Arpit Goel, Advocates.

Versus M/S VARAHI DIAMONDS AND FINANCE LTD ..... Respondent Through: Mr. Akshay Makhija, Sr. Advocate along with Mr. Vivek Singh, Mr.Digvijay Singh and Mr. Harsh Chugh, Advocates.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SACHIN DATTA

JUDGMENT

1. The present petition under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (the „A&C Act‟) has been filed seeking appointment of a Sole Arbitrator to adjudicate the disputes between the parties.

2. Briefly stated, the facts are that the petitioner is the owner/landlord of the building bearing Municipal No. 68, Janpath, New Delhi 110001, which he had leased out to the respondent company for a period of 15 years w.e.f. 01.08.2008 vide Lease Deed dated 07.08.2008. The respondent is stated to have defaulted in payment of monthly rent which has led to accumulation of huge arrears. The Lease Deed is also stated to have expired by efflux of time on 31.07.2023. The petitioner has served legal notices upon the respondent seeking payment of arrears of rent and calling upon

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top