$~27 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI % Date of decision: 4^th March, 2024 + W.P.(CRL) 715/2024 HARI SINGH ..... Petitioner Through: Ms. Niyati Sharma, Mr. Saurabh K.

Kaushik and Mr. Himanshu Chauhan, Advocates in person with his wife versus STATE OF N C T OF DELHI ORS .... Respondents Through: Mr. Sanjay Lao, Standing Counsel (Crl.) with Ms. Priyam Agarwal, Mr.

Abhinav Kr. Arya and Mr. Shivesh Kaushik, Advocates, Insp. Kishore Kumar and SI Rishikant Mishra Respondent No.5 in person CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURESH KUMAR KAIT HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ JAIN J U D G M E N T (oral)

CRL.M.A.6687/2024 (exemption)

1. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions.

2. Application stands disposed of.

W.P.(CRL) 715/2024

3. The present petition has been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India read with Section 482 Cr.P.C. in the form of Habeas W.P.(Crl) 715/2024 Page 1 of 4 Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed Corpus seeking directions to the respondent to produce petitioner’s daughter.

4. The brief facts of the present case are that on 08.07.2022, petitioner’s daughter married to respondent No.5. On 02.02.2023, the respondent No.5 took his wife to their matrimonial house.

5. On 09