IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH, JUSTICE SHAIL JAIN, JJ
SAMYAK JAIN – Appellant
Versus
SUPERINTENDENT (ADJUDICATION), CENTRAL GST DELHI & ORS. – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. facts alleging misuse of gst registration. (Para 2 , 3) |
$~2 * IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI Date of Decision: 25th August, 2025 + W.P.(C) 9139/2025 & CM APPL. 38812/2025 SAMYAK JAIN .....Petitioner Through: Mr. Pulkit Verma, Mr. Peyush Pruthi & Mr. Himanshu Yadav, Advs.
versus SUPERINTENDENT (ADJUDICATION), CENTRAL GST DELHI & ORS. .....Respondents Through: Mr. Atul Tripathi, SSC, CBIC with Mr. Gaurav Mani Tripathi & Mr.
Shubham Mishra, Advs for R-1 & 2. Mr. Rakesh Kumar, CGSC with Mr.
Sunil, Adv for R-4/Delhi Police (9811549455).
Mr. Samyar Jain, Adv. with Insp Awadesh Kumar & Insp. S.S. Gill, EOW.
Ms. Urvi Mohan, Adv. for GNCTD.
Inspector S.S. Gill, EOW, Delhi Police.
CORAM:
JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH JUSTICE SHAIL JAIN Prathiba M. Singh, J. (Oral)
1. This hearing has been done through hybrid mode.
2. The present petition has been filed on behalf of the Petitioner-Samyak Jain under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India, inter alia, challenging the order dated 31st January, 2025 (hereinafter, the ‘impugned order’) passed by the Respondent No. 1- Superintendent (Adjudication), Central GST Delhi.
3. Vide the impugned order, a demand has been raised on the
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.