Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
PRATEEK JALAN, J
PARAS RAM – Appellant
Versus
DELHI DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner's application for alternative plot rejected due to property ownership. (Para 2) |
| 2. dispute over whether the petitioner's sons' properties impact his eligibility. (Para 5) |
| 3. ownership outside delhi does not disqualify under policy. (Para 7) |
HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE PRATEEK JALAN PRATEEK JALAN, J. (ORAL)
1. Issue notice. Mr. Sanjay Vashishta, learned counsel, accepts notice on behalf of respondent No. 1. Mr. Sunil Kumar Jha, learned counsel, accepts notice on behalf of respondent Nos. 2 and 3.
2. The petitioner challenges an order of the Government of the National Capital Territory of Delhi [“GNCTD”] dated 21.09.2021, by which his application for allotment of an alternative plot in lieu of Signature Not Verified Signed By:UMANG W.P.(C) 12669/2025 Page 1 of 6 acquired land has been rejected.
3. The impugned order dated 21.09.2021 reads as follows:-
“Whereas, an application has been received from Sh, Paras Ram S/o Ram Narain, R/o 3D-158, Ward No. 5, NIT Faridabad, Haryana- 121001 on 17.05.2000 for allotment of alternate plot as per Government policy in lieu of acquisition of land of village Sahibabad Daulatpur vide Award No. 1/98-99.
Whereas, Committee observed that t
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
