IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
VIBHU BAKHRU, TEJAS KARIA, JJ
TUNGSTEN AUTOMATION ENGLAND LIMITED (FORMERLY KNOWN AS TUNGSTEN NETWORK LIMITED) – Appellant
Versus
DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, INTERNATIONAL TAXATION, CIRCLE 3(1)(1)NEW DELHI – Respondent
JUDGMENT
VIBHU BAKHRU, J
1. The appellant [Assessee] has filed the present appeals under Section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 [the Act] impugning a common order dated 18.12.2024 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal [the Tribunal] in ITA Nos.2237/Del/2024 and 2238/Del/2024 captioned Tungsten Network Ltd. v. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax in respect of the assessment years [AYs] 2016-17 and 2017-18.
2. The Assessee had preferred the said appeals before the Tribunal impugning separate assessment orders dated 12.03.2024 passed by the Assessing Officer [AO] under Section 147 read with Section 144 of the Act in respect of AYs 2016-17 and 2017-18. The final assessment orders were passed pursuant to directions issued by the Dispute Resolution Panel [DRP under Section 144 C(5) of the Act by separate orders dated 22.02.2024 passed in respect of each of the relevant AYs 2016-17 and 2017-18.
3. The Assessee is a company incorporated under the laws of the United Kingdom [UK] and is a tax resident of the UK. The Assessee is a wholly owned subsidiary of Tungsten Corporation Plc, which is also a company incorporated in the UK. The Assessee had not filed its return of income for the
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.