IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Prathiba M. Singh, Amit Sharma, JJ
BUDHI SINGH – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF NCT OF DELHI – Respondent
CRL.REF. 1/2025 in W.P.(CRL) 697/2022 | CRL.REF. 2/2025 in W.P.(CRL) 1044/2022 | CRL.REF. 3/2025 in W.P.(CRL) 1067/2022 | CRL.REF. 4/2025 in W.P.(CRL) 997/2022 | CRL.REF. 5/2025 in W.P.(CRL) 2835/2024 | CRL.REF. 6/2025 in W.P.(CRL) 299/2024 | CRL.REF. 7/2025 in W.P.(CRL) 1861/2023 | CRL.REF. 8/2025 in W.P.(CRL) 18/2024 | CRL.REF. 9/2025 in W.P.(CRL) 2257/2024 | CRL.REF. 10/2025 in W.P.(CRL) 2363/2024 | CRL.REF. 11/2025 in W.P.(CRL) 4080/2024
The court held that furlough applications can be considered by the executive during the pendency of appeals before the Supreme Court, and restrictions in prison rules that bar this right during such appeals violate constitutional provisions [p_71-74]. It also clarified that the terms 'High Court' and 'Supreme Court' are distinct in the rules, and the denial of furlough solely based on pending appeals in the Supreme Court would be unconstitutional, affirming the constitutional rights of prisoners to seek furlough even when appeals are ongoing [p_154-157][p_488-491].
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioners seeking furlough under prison rules. (Para 1) |
| 2. issues framed for consideration by the court. (Para 3 , 6) |
| 3. 'derogation of power' principle and its relation to furlough. (Para 8 , 12) |
JUDGMENT
`Can Furlough applications be considered by the Executive during the pendency of Appeals before the Supreme Court?’
1. The present petitions have been filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India read with Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 , (for short, ‘CrPC’) on behalf of the captioned respective Petitioners who CRL.REF. 1/2025 & other connected matters Page 4 of 105 Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed seek furlough under the Delhi Prison Rules, 2018 (hereinafter referred to as ‘Prison Rules’) during the pendency of their appeals before the Hon’ble Supreme Court.
FACTUAL BACKGROUND
2. Petitioner, Budhi Singh in W.P.(CRL) 697/2022, Basant Vallabh in W.P.(CRL) 997/2022, Suresh Chand Sharma in W.P.(CRL) 1044/2022 and Jai Pal Singh in W.P.(CRL) 1067/2022 had preferred the present petitions seeking first spell of furlough under the Prison Rules from the competent authority which was rejected on the ground of pendency of their appeals before the Hon’ble Supreme Court in view of Note 2 to Rule 1224 of the Prison Rules. Their respective rejection orders were challenged by these petitioners by way of aforementioned writ petitions which were disposed of by learned Single Bench of this Court vide judgment dated 3rd July, 2023. Learned Single Bench framed various issues that had arisen in these matters and while disposing some of them referred remaining issues in the form of reference to the Division Bench. The issues framed by the learned Single Judge vide order dated 02nd December, 2022, reads thus: -
“1. From the preliminary arguments advance on behalf of the parties, following issues are framed:
"A. Whether the principle of 'derogation of power' as laid down in the judgment of the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India in K.M. Nanavati v. The State of Bombay , AIR 1961 SC112 is applicable in cases where a prisoner seeks to apply for release on furlough under the Delhi Prison Rules, 2018 when an appeal against their order of conviction is pending adjudication in the Supreme Court of India?
B. Whether Note 2 to Rule 1224 in the Delhi Prison Rules, 2018 should be strictly interpreted and thus the CRL.REF. 1/2025 & other connected matters Page 5 of 105 Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed words High Court cannot be interpreted as including the Supreme Court of India, even in case of a statutory appeal before the Supreme Court?
C. Is there a violation of Article 14 of the Constitution of India if Note 2 to Rule 1224 of the Delhi Prison Rules is interpreted as barring the right of a prisoner to apply for release on furlough, when an appeal against their order of conviction is pending adjudication in the Hon 'ble Supreme Court of India?
D. Whether the High Court under Article 226 of the Constitution has the power to grant furlough. If so, can this power be exercised during the pendency of an appeal in the Supreme Court of India?
E. Is there a violation of Article 21 of the Constitution of India if Note 2 to Rule 1224 of the Delhi Prison Rules is interpreted as barring the right of a prisoner to apply for release on furlough, when an appeal against their order of conviction is pending adjudication in the Hon'ble Supreme Court of India?
F. Whether denial of furlough, on account of pendency of an appeal in the Supreme Court of India, despite good conduct earned by the convict, would run contrary to the theory of reformative approach and thereby violating Rules 1199 and 1200 of the Delhi Prison Rules, 2018 ?
G. Whether the jurisprudence on parole can be applied to furlough since furlough does not involve suspension of sentence? "
3. Learned Single Judge vide order dated 3rd July, 2023, gave the following findings with respect to the aforesaid issues: -
“Issue A: The principle of derogation of power as per th
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.