Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
MS. NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA, J
Ms. X – Appellant
Versus
STATE (NCT OF DELHI) through SHO, PS Saket – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petition for quashing an order regarding dna analysis. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. factual allegations of sexual assault against respondents. (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 3. evidence required for prosecution in a sexual assault case. (Para 7 , 8 , 18) |
| 4. judicial reasoning regarding the allowance of challenging orders. (Para 9 , 10) |
| 5. importance of dna evidence in proving sexual offences. (Para 12 , 13 , 19) |
| 6. contentions raised against taking dna sample and its implications. (Para 14 , 20 , 22 , 28) |
| 7. provisions regarding the collection of dna evidence under cr.p.c. (Para 51 , 52 , 56) |
| 8. final order permitting blood sample collection for dna testing. (Para 97 , 98) |
JUDGMENT
NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA, J.
1. Petition under Section 482 Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (hereinafter referred to as ― Cr.P.C .‖) has been filed by the Petitioner/Ms. X seeking quashing of Order dated 19.04.2023 passed by learned Additional Sessions Judge, New Delhi setting aside Order of learned M.M. dated 02.06.2022, whereby blood sample of Respondent No.2/Abhishek Paruthi was permitted to be taken for DNA analysis.
2. Briefly stated, on the Complaint made by the Petitioner / Prosecutrix, FIR No.176/2021 under Sectio
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
