Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
RAVINDER DUDEJA, J
ARPIT MISHRA – Appellant
Versus
STATE (GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI) – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petition filed for anticipatory bail based on serious allegations. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. defence argues fir is motivated, lacks evidence and contains contradictions. (Para 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 3. prosecution's evidence and conduct in question, challenges credibility. (Para 7 , 10) |
| 4. court evaluation emphasizes balancing allegations with presumption of innocence. (Para 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16) |
| 5. inconsistent evidence and procedural lapses justified granting of bail. (Para 18) |
| 6. conditions imposed for bail ensure protection of investigation integrity. (Para 19 , 20 , 21) |
JUDGMENT
RAVINDER DUDEJA, J.
1. This is a petition under Section 482 Cr. PC read with Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 [" BNSS "] for Bail Appln. 1761/2025 Page 1 of 12 Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed grant of anticipatory bail filed on behalf of the petitioner in Case FIR No. 83/2025, registered at PS Bharat Nagar, under Section 3 51(2), 79, and 3(5) of BNS, 2023.
2. As per the FIR registered on 19.02.2025, based on a verbal complaint by the prosecutrix, it is alleged that on the night of 16.02.2025, she received multiple abusive and threatening phone calls from an unknown num
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
