SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Del) 5739

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
Neena Bansal Krishna, J
MOHD. ANWAR – Appellant
Versus
STATE NCT OF DELHI – Respondent
CRL.M.C. 196/2021|CRL.M.A. 996/2021|CRL.M.C. 1181/2021|CRL.M.A. 6045/2021|CRL.M.C. 1182/2021|CRL.M.A. 6047/2021|CRL.M.C. 197/2021|CRL.M.A. 998/2021|CRL.M.A. 3948/2022|CRL.M.C. 2100/2021|CRL.M.A. 14116/2021|CRL.M.A. 3961/2022|CRL.M.A. 3962/2022|CRL.M.C. 315/2021|CRL.M.A. 1604/2021|CRL.M.A. 3907/2022|CRL.M.C. 316/2021|CRL.M.A. 1607/2021|CRL.M.C. 382/2021|CRL.M.A. 2011/2021|CRL.M.A. 3920/2022|CRL.M.C. 384/2021|CRL.M.A. 2014/2021|CRL.M.C. 385/2021|CRL.M.A. 2023/2021|CRL.M.A. 3913/2022|CRL.M.C. 402/2021|CRL.M.A. 2111/2021|CRL.M.A. 3910/2022|CRL.M.C. 426/2021|CRL.M.C. 1707/2023|CRL.M.C. 1732/2023|CRL.M.C. 196/2021|CRL.M.C. 1662/2023|CRL.M.C. 196/2021|CRL.M.C. 315/2021|CRL.M.C. 316/2021|CRL.M.C. 270/2021|CRL.M.C. 1732/2023



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Ms. Ashima Mandla & Ms. Mandakini Singh
For the Respondents: Mr. Amol Sinha, ASC for State with Mr. Kshitiz Garg, Mr. Nitish Dhawan, Mr. Rahul Kochar, Ms. Chavi Lazarus, Ms. Sanskriti Nimbekar

Quashing of FIRs based on COVID-19 regulations requires clear evidence of promulgation and knowledge of the prohibition by the accused; failure to establish these negates the charges under relevant sections.

Headnote:(A) Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 - Section 482 - Indian Penal Code, 1860 - Sections 188, 269, 270, 271, 120B - Epidemic Diseases Act, 1897 - Sections 3 - Disaster Management Act, 2005 - Sections 51, 58 - Quashing of FIRs - Petitioners sought to quash multiple FIRs filed against them for allegedly violating prohibitory orders during the COVID-19 pandemic - The court held that no prima facie offence was made out under the IPC and the relevant Acts due to lack of evidence regarding promulgation and awareness of the prohibitory orders by the petitioners - The alleged actions taken during a lockdown were not founded in law as no violation occurred - The petitions were ultimately allowed for quashing the FIRs and discharging the accused. (Paras 1, 10, 34, 96, 97)

(B) Inherent Power of High Court - The court reiterated that inherent power to quash proceedings exists to prevent abuse and secure justice, stressing that the continuation of proceedings lacking a prima facie case violates the principles of justice. (Para 42)

(C) Ingredients for S.188 IPC - The court outlined essential criteria that need to be fulfilled to constitute an offence under Section 188 IPC, stressing the need for proper promulgation and knowledge by the accused, which was absent in this case. (Paras 51, 67)

JUDGMENT

NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA, J.

1. The aforesaid Petitions have been filed under Section 482 Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 ( Cr.P.C .) seeking quashing of various FIRs under Sections 188 /269/270/271/120B IPC read with Section 3 of the Epidemic Diseases Act, 1897 and Sections 51 /58 of the Disaster Management Act, 2005 , registered at P.S. Chandani Mahal, Sarai Rohilla, and Krishna Nagar between 31.03.2020 and 02.04.2020.

2. The brief background of the aforesaid cases leading to the registration of the aforesaid FIRs, may firstly be considered. Tablighi Jamaat, an Islamic self-reformatory movement for the followers of Islam, having its global Headquarters at the Nizamuddin Markaz, New Delhi, organizes annual religious congregation. On the aforementioned occasion, the followers and members of the Movement from across the globe, participate in this religious congregation at the Markaz. The details of which are formalized a year in advance, for the convenience of the foreign nationals to attend the same. This year, the congregation was scheduled for early March, 2020, well before the outbreak of COVID-19 pandemic.

3. On 11.03.2020, The World Health Organization declared novel Corona Virus (Covid-19) as a pandemic. On the same date, the Ministry of Health & Family Welfare, Govt. of India notified the suspension of visas till 15.04.2020 except for a few categories such as diplomatic, official, UN / international organization, Project visa.

4. On 13.03.2020, the Delhi Government pursuant to the powers conferred by the Delhi Epidemic Diseases, Covid-19, Regulations, 2020 under the Epidemic Diseases Act, 1897 , capped all sports gatherings (including IPL) / conferences and seminars at 200 persons. However, there was no mention in regard to prohibiting the religious congregations.

5. On 16.03.2020, the Delhi Government issued an Order in supersession of its earlier Order dated 13.03.2020, expanding the prohibitions to social, cultural, political, religious gatherings and academic/sports/seminars events, which was restricted to 50 persons.

6. On 22.03.2020, “Janta Curfew” was declared by Respondent No. 2 / Union of India, consequent to which a nationwide lockdown for a period of 21 days was declared to be in effect from 25.03.2020. There was four continuous extension of this Nationwide Lockdown, till 31.05.2020.

7. On 24.03.2020, ACP, Sub-Division- Darya Ganj issued an Order under Section 144 Cr.P.C . thereby prohibiting Social / Cultural / Political / Religious / Academic / Sports / Seminar / Conference in the wake of Covid- 19 pandemic.

8. On 31.03.2020, Crime Branch registered FIR No.63/2020 at PS Crime Branch under Sections 188 /269/270/271/120B IPC read with Section 3 of the Epidemic Diseases Act, 1897 and Sections 51 /58 of the Disaster Management Act, 2005 , against alleged organizers of Tablighi Jamaat. FIR No. 63/2020 is stated to be limited to Indian Nationals and alleged organizers of Jamaat congregation at Nizamuddin Markaz.

9. Additionally, the Respondents herein registered the Impugned FIRs at PS: Chandani Mahal, Sarai Rohilla, Krishna Nagar under Sections 188 /269/120B IPC, details of the same are as under:

MOHD. ANWAR & ORS.V. STATE (NCT OF DELHI) CRL.MISC. (MAIN) NO.196 OF 2021
DETAILS OF FIRNAME OF ACCUSED PERSONS(INDIAN NATIONALS) @Pg 9QUASHING PETITION FILED PREVIOUSLY BY FOREIGN NATIONALS @Pg93ALLEGE D LOCATI ON OF OFFENC EDATE OF COMPLAIN T U/S 195 CrPC @Pg91
FIR NO. 074/2020 dated 31.03.2020 u/s 188/269/270 @Pg 601. MOHD ANWAR 2. AMIR HASAN 3. MOHD. AFTAB 4. MOHD. SALMAN 5. SAFIQUIDDI NCrl.M.C. No. 1685/2020 titled Thein Win &Ors. v State of NCT of Delhi & Ors. Disposed vide order dated 24.08.2020Choti Masjid, FatakTeliy an23.07.2020 filed by ACP, Darya Ganj
SHEHZAD ALI & ANR.V. STATE (NCT OF DELHI) CRL.MISC. (MAIN) NO. 426 OF 2021
DETAILS OF FIRNAME OF ACCUSEDPERSONS (INDIAN NATIONALS) @Pg 5QUASHING PETITION FILED PREVIOUSLY BY FOREIGN NATIONALS @Pg88ALLEGE D LOCATI ON OF OFFENC EDATE OF COMPLAIN T U/S 195 CrPC @Pg84
FIR

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top