SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Del) 5744

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
TARA VITASTA GANJU, J
NIRMAL GUPTA – Appellant
Versus
RAM NIWAS GUPTA – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr. Abhay Kumar
For the Respondents: None

HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE TARA VITASTA GANJU TARA VITASTA GANJU, J.: (Oral)

1. This Court had on 16.07.2025 passed the following directions:

1. The present Petition has been filed under Section 115(1) of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 seeking to set aside the order dated 17.05.2025 passed by the learned District Judge (Commercial Court)-07, Central District, Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi [hereinafter referred to as “Impugned Order”].

2. At the outset, learned Counsel for the Petitioner raises a challenge in view of Section 8 of the Commercial Courts Act, 2015 [hereinafter referred to as “CC Act”] to submit that the Petition is not maintainable. Section 8 of the CC Act debars revisions against an order of a commercial court in the following manner:

“8. Bar against revision application or petition against an interlocutory order.Notwithstanding anything contained in any other law for the time being in force, no civil revision application or petition shall be entertained against any interlocutory order of a Commercial Court, including an order on the issue of jurisdiction, and any such challenge, subject to the provisions of section 13, shall be raised only in an appeal against the decree of

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top