IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
TARA VITASTA GANJU, J
NIRMAL GUPTA – Appellant
Versus
RAM NIWAS GUPTA – Respondent
HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE TARA VITASTA GANJU TARA VITASTA GANJU, J.: (Oral)
1. This Court had on 16.07.2025 passed the following directions:
1. The present Petition has been filed under Section 115(1) of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 seeking to set aside the order dated 17.05.2025 passed by the learned District Judge (Commercial Court)-07, Central District, Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi [hereinafter referred to as “Impugned Order”].
2. At the outset, learned Counsel for the Petitioner raises a challenge in view of Section 8 of the Commercial Courts Act, 2015 [hereinafter referred to as “CC Act”] to submit that the Petition is not maintainable. Section 8 of the CC Act debars revisions against an order of a commercial court in the following manner:
“8. Bar against revision application or petition against an interlocutory order.—Notwithstanding anything contained in any other law for the time being in force, no civil revision application or petition shall be entertained against any interlocutory order of a Commercial Court, including an order on the issue of jurisdiction, and any such challenge, subject to the provisions of section 13, shall be raised only in an appeal against the decree of
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.