IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA, J
PARDEEP PRADHAN – Appellant
Versus
STATE (GOVT. OF NCT OF DELHI) – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. bail application factual context. (Para 1) |
NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA, J.
1. First Bail Application under Section 483 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita , 2023 (earlier Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973) has been filed on behalf of Petitioner – Pardeep Pradhan for grant of Regular Bail in FIR No. 0461/2021 dated 19.11.2021 under Section 364A /392/397/412/34 of the Indian Penal Code , 1860 (hereinafter referred to as „IPC‟) and Sections 25 /27/54/59/30 of Arms Act , registered at Police Station Paharganj.
Signature Not Verified BAIL APPLN. 1505/2025 Page 1 of 7 Signed By:ANIL
2. Briefly stated, the Bail Application filed before the learned ASJ had been dismissed vide Order dated 04.04.2025. It is submitted that the Applicant is an Accused and not a convict. The over-arching postulate of criminal jurisprudence that the Accused is presumed to be innocent unless proven guilty, cannot be brushed aside lightly howsoever stringent the penal law may be. It is submitted that due to lack of post-operative palliative care, the Applicant’s mother is experiencing complications in her operated eye. She is in urgent need of cataract surgery for her right eye and
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.