IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
TARA VITASTA GANJU, J
MINOSHA INDIA LIMITED – Appellant
Versus
MR. DEEPAK TIWARI & ORS. – Respondent
HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE TARA VITASTA GANJU TARA VITASTA GANJU, J.: (Oral)
1. The present Petition has been filed under Section 115 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 [hereinafter referred to as “CPC”] impugning the order dated 26.08.2023 passed by the learned District Judge (Commercial Court)-02, Central District, Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi [hereinafter referred to as “Impugned Order”].
2. The attention of the learned Counsel for the Petitioners is drawn to the provisions of Section 8 of the CC Act, which sets out that no civil revision petition shall be entertained against an interlocutory order passed by the Commercial Courts. It is apposite to set out Section 8 of the CC Act below:
“8. Bar against revision application or petition against an interlocutory order.—Notwithstanding anything contained in any other law for the time being in force, no civil revision application or petition shall be entertained against any interlocutory order of a Commercial Court, including an order on the issue of jurisdiction, and any such challenge, subject to the Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed provisions of section 13, shall be raised only in an appeal against the decree of the Commercial Co
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.