IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
NAVIN CHAWLA, MADHU JAIN, JJ
UNION OF INDIA AND ANR. – Appellant
Versus
MANOJ KUMAR – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. importance of evidence in employment termination. (Para 4) |
| 2. final ruling on dismissal of petitions. (Para 5) |
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE NAVIN CHAWLA HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE MADHU JAIN Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed W.P.(C) 10233/2023 & CONNECTED MATTERS Page 2 of 5 NAVIN CHAWLA, J. (ORAL)
1. These petitions have been filed challenging the orders passed by the learned Central Administrative Tribunal, Principal Bench, New Delhi (in short, ‘Tribunal’). As they raise similar issues, they have been taken up together. For sake of convenience, the OA numbers, the date of the Impugned Order and the corresponding Writ Petitions numbers are being given in a form of a table hereinbelow:-
Writ Petition No.
O.A. No.
Date of the Order
W.P.(C) 10233/2023
1636/2019
23.11.2022
W.P.(C) 10228/2023
1639/2019
23.11.2022
W.P.(C) 10230/2023
1640/2019
23.11.2022
W.P.(C) 12741/2023
1635/2019
06.03.2023
W.P.(C) 13025/2023
464/2020
09.02.2023
W.P.(C) 13494/2023
318/2020
08.02.2023
W.P.(C) 13520/2023
761/2019
08.02.2023
W.P.(C) 13522/2023
765/2019
08.02.2023
W.P.(C) 13545/2023
764/2019
08.02.2023
2. By the Impugned Orders, the learned Tribunal has allowed the OA(s) and ha
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.