SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Del) 6112

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
MANOJ KUMAR OHRI, J
FAHIM @ CHIKNA – Appellant
Versus
STATE – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr. Kartickay Mathur
For the Respondents: Mr. Pradeep Gahalot

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANOJ KUMAR OHRI JUDGMENT (ORAL)

1. By way of the present appeal, the appellant seeks to assail the judgement of conviction dated 09.10.2019 vide which he has been convicted for offences punishable under Sections 392 IPC and Section 411 IPC and order on sentence dated 10.10.2019 vide which he has been directed to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of 5 years for the offence punishable under Section 392 IPC alongwith payment of fine of Rs.5,000/-, in default whereof he was directed to further undergo simple imprisonment for a period of 1 month and undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of 1 year for the offence punishable under Sections 411 IPC . Benefit of Section 428 CrPC has been provided to the appellant and all the sentences were directed to run concurrently.

2. The brief facts of the case, is that on 16.07.2017, DD No.44B came to be recorded at P.S. MS Park, Delhi with the information that one boy had entered a parlour at D-401, Gali No.5, Hardev Puri at about 6:25 P.M and Signature Not Verified CRL.A. 177/2020 Page 1 of 5 has robbed one gold chain in the parlour shop. HC Mahesh Pal reached at the spot and recorded statement of the complainant. I

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top