Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
TARA VITASTA GANJU, J
PREETI JAIN & ORS. – Appellant
Versus
ALKA SAXENA & ANR. – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. application for delay condonation. (Para 1) |
| 2. challenge based on code of civil procedure's revision grounds. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. limitations of section 115 regarding interim orders. (Para 5 , 6) |
HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE TARA VITASTA GANJU TARA VITASTA GANJU, J.: (Oral)
CM Appl. 49919/2025[Seeking condonation of delay]
1. The present Application has been filed on behalf of the Petitioners seeking condonation of delay of 8 days in filing the present Petition.
2. For the reasons as stated in the Application, the delay is condoned.
3. The Application stands disposed of.
C.R.P. 234/2025
4. The present Petition has been filed on behalf of the Petitioners under Section 115 read with Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 [hereinafter referred to as “CPC”] against the order dated 23.04.2025 passed by learned District Judge-07, South East District, Saket Courts, Delhi [hereinafter referred to as “Impugned Order”]. By the Impugned Order, the Application under Order XXXII Rule 15 of the CPC filed by the Petitioners has been dismissed by the learned Trial Court.
5. The maintainability of this Petition is a subject matter of challenge. It Signature Not Verified Digitally Signed is
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
