Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
SUBRAMONIUM PRASAD, VIMAL KUMAR YADAV, JJ
SANDEEP – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF NCT OF DELHI – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. appeal filed against conviction under b.n.s.s. and ipc relating to sexual offences. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. arguments for and against the suspension of the appellant's sentence. (Para 4 , 5) |
| 3. importance of child protection and legal framework under the pocso act. (Para 6 , 7 , 8) |
| 4. court decision reflects a need for compelling justification for post-conviction bail. (Para 9) |
| 5. final ruling on the application for suspension of the sentence. (Para 10) |
O R D E R
% 02.09.2025 CRL.A. 1243/2025
1. The present appeal under Section 415 read with Section 528 of B.N.S.S. , 2023 has been filed on behalf of the Appellant against the Judgment on conviction dated 07.05.2025 and the Order on Sentence dated 09.06.2025 passed by the Ld. ASJ (FTSC)(POCSO)-02, South West District, Dwarka Courts, New Delhi in SC No.346/2018.
2. Vide Judgment dated 07.05.2025, the Appellant has been convicted for the offences punishable under Sections 366 /376(2)(i)/506 of the IPC & Sections 6 read with 5(m) of POCSO Act in SC No.346/2018 arising out of FIR No.61/2018 dated 23.03.2018 registered at Police Station Baba Haridas Nagar, Dwarka. Vide Order on Sentence dated 09.06.2025, the Appellant has CRL.A. 1243
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
