Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
ANUP JAIRAM BHAMBHANI, J
M/S FMS FR. MAYERS SOHN INDIA PVT. LTD. – Appellant
Versus
BUILTUBE INDUSTRIES LTD & ANR. – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. absence of respondents in court. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. condoning delay in filing an appeal. (Para 5 , 6 , 12) |
| 3. jurisdiction and relevance of supreme court directives. (Para 10 , 11 , 15) |
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANUP JAIRAM BHAMBHANI
O R D E R
% 02.09.2025 No one is present on behalf of the respondents when the matter is called-out.
2. The order sheets shows that no one has appeared for the respondents on
06.02.2024, 23.04.2024, 28.11.2024 and 02.05.2025.
3. In view of the above, it appears that the respondents are not interested in being represented in the matter.
4. The respondents are accordingly set ex-parte.
CM APPL. 41636/2021
5. By way of the present application filed under section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure 1908 (‘CPC’), the appellant seeks condonation of about 223 days’ delay in filing the regular first appeal.
6. Notice on this application was issued on 24.11.2021.
7. No reply has been filed by the respondents to this application.
8. As recorded above, the respondents have now been set ex-parte.
9. Mr. Sajjan K. Singh, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the appellant submits, that impugned judgment and decree dated RFA391/2021 Page1of3
23.12.2020 passed by
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
