Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
SAURABH BANERJEE, J
MASIHI SAHITYA SANSTHA – Appellant
Versus
ABSTERGE REAL ESTATE PVT. LTD. – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. application to introduce new evidence. (Para 2) |
| 2. legal process for evidence inclusion. (Para 3 , 5) |
| 3. strict adherence to statutory timelines. (Para 6 , 9) |
| 4. decision on application outcome. (Para 11 , 12) |
O R D E R
% 01.09.2025 CM 54521/25-By petitioner for placing additional material on record in compliance of order dated 14.08.2025 passed in CRP No. 229/2025. 1. By virtue of the present application, the petitioner seeks to place on record following three documents:
Annexure-1: True copy of the petition in CRP 229 of 2025 [earlier CM (M) 1407 of 2025]
Annexure-2: True copy of the common order dated 31.07.2025 passed in CM (M) 1407 of 2025 and CM (M) 1408/2025 Annexure-3: True copy of the order dated 14.08.2025 in CRP
229/2025
2. Learned senior counsel for the petitioner submits that the documents filed as Annexures-1 & 2 though came into existence subsequent to the passing of the impugned order dated 24.12.2024, however, they are essential for adjudication of the present petition, and moreover, drawing attention to the order dated 14.08.2025 passed by a co- ordinate bench of this Court in CRP 229/2025 (Annexure-3), he contends that the petitioner was permitted ther
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
