Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
ARUN MONGA, J
HIMANSHU BUDHIRAJA – Appellant
Versus
BABY MYSHA BUDHIRAJA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. dismissal of application for producing email. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. petitioner's arguments regarding evidence and maintenance. (Para 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 3. application of section 94 in maintenance contexts. (Para 8) |
| 4. irrelevance of past emails to current maintenance issues. (Para 9) |
| 5. overall dismissal of the petition on grounds stated. (Para 10) |
O R D E R
% 28.08.2025 CRL.M.A. 25676/2025 (exemption)
Exemption allowed, subject to all just exceptions.
The application stands disposed of.
CRL.REV.P.(MAT.) 397/2025
1. Petitioner is before this Court for setting aside the order dated 29.04.2025 passed by the learned Judge, Family Court-02 (West), Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi, in MT No.592/2023 titled as Baby Mysha through Latika Katyal vs. Himanshu Budhiraja, whereby the application under Section 91 Cr.P.C./ 94 BNSS filed by the petitioner was dismissed.
2. The petitioner, Himanshu Budhiraja, married the respondent, Ms. Latika Katyal, on 12.02.2016, and a daughter was born on 17.12.2019. Due to matrimonial discord, the respondent left with the child on 22.11.2020, leading to several litigations until a mutual settlement on 09.05.2023, followed by a divorce decree on 09.06.2023. The petitioner a
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
