Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
NEENA BANSAL KRISHNA, J
TEENA GARG & ORS. – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF GNCT OF DELHI & ORS. – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. firs arise from matrimonial disputes settled amicably. (Para 1 , 4 , 9) |
| 2. respondents express no grievance against petitioners. (Para 2 , 8) |
| 3. court acknowledges resolution of disputes and consent of parties. (Para 3 , 6 , 10) |
| 4. agreement signed voluntarily without coercion. (Para 5 , 7) |
O R D E R
% 28.08.2025
1. Petitions under Section 528 of the Bhartiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita , 2023 have been preferred on behalf of the Petitioners for quashing of two FIRs, bearing FIR No.0332/2020 under Sections 308/341/506/34 IPC, registered at PS: Madhu Vihar and FIR No.0238/2021 under Sections 376/377/498A/406/506/34/ 328/342/354 IPC read with Section 6 POCSO Act, registered at PS: Bindapur and all consequential proceedings emanating therefrom, in terms of Settlement Agreement dated 21.11.2024.
2. Learned APP for the State and learned counsel for the Respondents appear on advance Notice.
3. The dispute in FIR No.0238/2021 arise from matrimonial discord and the allegations therein against the Petitioner are of Section 376 IPC read with Section 6 POCSO. However, the Prosecutrix and the Petitioner Ankit Kumar apparently were in some relationship nearly 10 years ago and they got ma
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
