Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
ANIL KSHETARPAL, HARISH VAIDYANATHA SHANKAR, JJ
MANIA GHAI – Appellant
Versus
NISHANT CHANDER – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. factual background of the case (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. arguments on homemaker's contribution (Para 4 , 5) |
| 3. court's examination of legal standards and principles (Para 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14) |
| 4. recognition of homemaker's contributions requires evidence (Para 16 , 17 , 22 , 24 , 29) |
| 5. conclusion on dismissal of the appeal (Para 30 , 31 , 32) |
JUDGMENT
HARISH VAIDYANATHAN SHA NKAR, J.
1. The present Appeal, under Section 19(1) of the Family Courts Act , 1984, has been filed by the Appellant assailing the Order dated 16.07.2025, [1Impugned Order] passed by the learned Principal Judge, Family Court, Rohini (North), Delhi, [Family Court], in CS No. 12/2025 titled “Mania Ghai v. Nishant Chander.” By way of the Impugned Order, the learned Family Court rejected, at the threshold, the civil suit instituted by the Appellant for declaration, mandatory injunction, and permanent injunctions, holding that the plaint failed to disclose any cause of action.
2. Shorn of unnecessary details, the facts, as pleaded by the Appellant and relevant for the present Appeal, are as follows:-
(a). The parties are husband (Respondent) and wife (Appellant), whose marriage was solemnised on 1
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
