Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
MANOJ JAIN, J
NARENDER SINGH – Appellant
Versus
SHAKUNTALA SOLANKI AND ANR – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitions raised similar issues and are taken together. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. electronic evidence offered by petitioner discussed. (Para 5 , 6 , 7) |
O R D E R
% 28.08.2025
1. Since the identical issues have been raised in both the abovesaid petitions, these have been taken up together.
2. The plaintiff in both the abovesaid suits is Mr. Narender Singh (petitioner herein) albeit the buyers are different who have been impleaded as defendant No.1 in said suits.
3. The suits seek cancellation, declaration and injunction.
4. During the pendency of the abovesaid suits and before issues could be CM(M) 206/2024& CM(M) 207/2024 1 framed, the plaintiff filed separate applications in such two suits. These were under Order VI Rule 17 read with Order I Rule 10 CPC and the grievance in the present petitions is with respect to the dismissal of such applications on
08.12.2023.
5. During course of the arguments, learned counsel for petitioner/plaintiff submitted that plaintiff is, inter alia, relying upon call recording dated 22.11.2019 and such recording, along with the transcript and certificate under Section 65B of Indian Evidence Act, 1872 (corresponding Section 63 of Bharatiya Sakshya A
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
