IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
MANOJ KUMAR OHRI, J
M/S KUSHAL INFRAPROJECT INDUSTRIES LTD – Appellant
Versus
STATE & ANR – Respondent
O R D E R
% 27.08.2025
1. The present petition has been filed under Section 378(4) Cr.P.C. by the petitioner/complainant seeking leave to appeal against the judgement dated 06.01.2018 passed by learned JMFC, NI Act, Patiala House Court in the case bearing CC No.96/0/12 titled as ‘M/S KUSHAL INFRAPROJECT INDUSTRIES LTD VS GAGANDEEP KAUR’, vide which the respondent No.2 was acquitted of the offense under Section 138 NI Act.
2. The attention of this Court is drawn to the recent decision of the Supreme Court in Celestium Financial vs A. Gnanasekaran etc, reported as 2025 SCC OnLine SC 1320 wherein, it has been held that the complainant under Section 138 NI Act, who suffers financial loss and injury on account of the dishonour of cheque, would qualify as a victim within the meaning of Section 2 (wa) Cr.P.C.
It was further held that such a complainant could maintain an appeal under proviso to Section 372 CrPC in his own right, without complying with the rigours of Section 378(4) CrPC. The relevant portion is extracted hereunder:-
“7.7 In the context of offences under the Act, particularly under Section 138 of the said Act, the complainant is clearly the aggrieved party who has suffered
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.