Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
MANOJ KUMAR OHRI, J
SABUDDIN @ SABU – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE NCT OF DELHI – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. application for suspension of sentence filed. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. allegations and evidence against the appellant discussed. (Para 5 , 6 , 7) |
| 3. assessment of conviction sustainability. (Para 8 , 9) |
| 4. application dismissed without changes to sentence. (Para 10) |
O R D E R
% 26.08.2025 CRL.M.(BAIL) 926/2025 (suspension of sentence)
1. The present application has been filed seeking suspension of sentence during the pendency of the appeal.
2. By way of the accompanying appeal, the appellant seeks to assail the judgment of conviction dated 30.01.2024 vide which he was convicted for the offences under Section 377 /34 IPC and Section 6 POCSO Act and order on sentence dated 27.07.2024 vide which he has been directed to undergo rigorous imprisonment for a period of 20 years for the offence punishable under Section 6 of POCSO Act along with payment of fine of Rs.10,000/- in default whereof, he was directed to further undergo simple imprisonment for a period of one month. He was extended the benefit of Section 428 CrPC.
3. Mr. Vidit Anand, Advocate enters appearance for the victim and states that he has been appointed by the victim to represent her.
4. In view of the above, learned
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
