Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
JUSTICE PRATHIBA M. SINGH, JUSTICE SHAIL JAIN, JJ
GENESIS ENTERPRISES – Appellant
Versus
PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER CGST DELHI EAST – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. allegation of unauthorized search and seizure. (Para 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 2. discussion on pending petitions and representation. (Para 6 , 8) |
| 3. prohibition on accessing seized data. (Para 10) |
| 4. next steps for case listing. (Para 11) |
ORDER
09.09.2025
1. This hearing has been done through hybrid mode.
CM APPL. 56712/2025 (for exemption)
2. Allowed, subject to all just exceptions. Application is disposed of.
W.P.(C) 13821/2025 & CM APPL. 56711/2025 (for interim relief)
3. This petition has been filed by the Petitioner– M/s Genesis Enterprises through its partner, Shri Abhishek Gumber seeking inter alia issuance of directions to declare the removal and seizure of storage devices from CCTV cameras, as unsustainable and impermissible and such search being violative of the right to privacy of the Petitioner.
4. The case of the Petitioner is that an unauthorized search was conducted by the CGST Department, Delhi East in cooperation with the CGST Department, Noida (hereinafter, ‘the CGST Department’) on 22nd July, 2025, wherein the residential premises of the Petitioner and his entire family was raided and a large number of electronic gadgets were also seized. Another main grievance of th
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
