Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
SANJEEV NARULA, J
GAURAV KAMRA – Appellant
Versus
SHUBDHA KAMRA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. court's discretion to determine maintenance payments and adjourn appeal. (Para 2 , 3 , 7) |
| 2. the importance of compliance with interim orders in domestic violence cases. (Para 4 , 5 , 6) |
O R D E R
% 26.08.2025 CRL.M.A. 25353/2025 (seeking exemption from filing the certified copy of the annexures P-1 to P-6)
1. Exemption is granted, subject to all just exceptions.
2. The Petitioner shall file legible and clearer copies of exempted documents, compliant with practice rules, before the next date of hearing.
3. Accordingly, the application stands disposed of.
CRL.REV.P.(MAT.) 392/2025
4. The present petition under Section 438/442 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 is directed against impugned order dated 21st May, 2025, passed by the Principal District & Sessions Judge (North), Rohini Courts, Delhi in CNR No. DLNT01-005341-2025, titled “Gaurav Kamra v.
Shubdha Kamra”
5. The brief facts of the case are that the Respondent (wife) filed a complaint against the Petitioner (husband) under Section 12 of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 ,, [“DV Act”] along with an interim application under Section 23 of DV Act. Pursuant thereto, the Mahila Court
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
