ANJU @ ANJU BALA vs RAMPAL

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV, J
ANJU @ ANJU BALA – Appellant
Versus
RAMPAL – Respondent

Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr. Anil K. Aggarwal, Mr. B. N. Sharma
For the Respondents: Mr. Anupam Lal Das, Mr. Ujjwal Jha, Mr. Anirudh Singh, Mr. Rohan Gupta

Table of Content
1. plaintiffs allege misappropriation by defendants. (Para 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6)
2. defendant argues for delay condonation due to lawful challenge. (Para 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18)
3. court's interpretation of procedural norms under cpc. (Para 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34)
4. outcome of previous appeals affects current case. (Para 35 , 36 , 37)
5. court condones delay; emphasizes justice over procedure. (Para 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 , 44 , 45 , 46 , 47 , 48 , 49 , 50 , 51)

The instant applications have been filed by defendant No.1 seeking condonation of delay in compliance with orders dated 11.10.2023 and 12.03.2024, whereby defendant No.1 was granted conditional leave to defend and was directed to furnish a security of Rs 1.20 crores.

2. The present suit has been instituted by the plaintiffs, Anju @ Anju Bala, widow of late Mr. Hari Om Rana, and her minor daughter Bharti Rana. The plaintiffs allege that after the death of late Mr. Hari Om Rana (hereinafter referred to as ‘the deceased’) on 07.10.2008, defendant No.1, namely, Mr. Rampal, father of the deceased and father- in- law of plaintiff no. 1 herein and, offic

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHIPURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV, JANJU @ ANJU BALA – AppellantVersusRAMPAL – Respondent

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV, J
ANJU @ ANJU BALA – Appellant
Versus
RAMPAL – Respondent