“43. In view of the above discussion, I am of the view that the issues raised in the present applications can only be decided after evidence is led on behalf of the parties. Therefore, I proceed to frame issues.

EA 535/2018

I. Whether the decree dated 3rd May, 2016 in CS(OS) 2453/2015 would be operative against the Objector in respect of the portions of the suit property occupied by him? (OP-Decree Holders)

II. Whether the Sale Deed dated 25th February, 2002 was entered into between the Judgment Debtor and the Objector in a collusive or fraudulent manner? (OP-Decree Holders)

III. Whether the Sale Deed dated 25th February, 2002 is otherwise valid and legally binding? (OP-Decree Holders)

IV. Whether the Objector has acquired right, title and interest in the suit property on the basis of adverse possession? (OP-Objector)

V. Whether the signatures of the mother of the Decree Holders on the Agreement to Sell dated 29th August, 1993, were forged? (OP-Decree Holders)

VI. In the event the Sale Deed dated 25th February, 2002 in favour of the Objector is held to be not valid, whether the Objector is entitled to specific performance. of the Agreement to Sell dated 29th August, 1993? (OP-Objector)

4

Click Here to Read the rest of this document