Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
SUBRAMONIUM PRASAD, HARISH VAIDYANATHAN SHANKAR, JJ
DIRECTORATE OF ENFORCEMENT THROUGH ASSISTANT DIRECTOR DELHI – Appellant
Versus
RAJESH KUMAR AGARWAL – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. background details of investigation and appeal. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12) |
| 2. arguments presented by both parties. (Para 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33) |
| 3. court analysis of statutory provisions. (Para 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 , 44 , 45 , 46 , 47 , 48 , 49 , 50 , 51 , 52 , 53 , 54 , 55 , 56 , 57 , 58 , 59 , 60 , 61 , 62 , 63 , 64 , 65 , 66 , 67 , 68 , 69 , 70 , 71 , 72 , 73 , 74 , 75 , 76 , 77 , 78 , 79 , 80) |
| 4. legal principles concerning procedural compliance. (Para 81 , 82 , 83 , 84 , 85 , 86 , 87 , 88 , 89 , 90 , 91 , 92 , 93 , 94 , 95 , 96 , 97 , 98 , 99 , 100 , 101 , 102) |
BRIEF FACTS:
1. The Appellant/ Directorate of Enforcement, ED has preferred the present appeal under Section 42 of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002, PMLA/ Act challenging the Order dated 06.02.2019, Impugned Order passed in FPA-PMLA-1973/DLI/2017 by the learned Appellate Tribunal (PMLA), New Delhi, AT/Tribunal. By the said order, the learned AT set aside the Order dated 21.08.2017 passed by the learned Adjudicating Authority (PMLA), AA which had allowed Origina
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
