Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
SUBRAMONIUM PRASAD, HARISH VAIDYANATHAN SHANKAR, JJ
DIRECTORATE OF ENFORCEMENT THROUGH ASSISTANT DIRECTOR DELHI – Appellant
Versus
RAJESH KUMAR AGARWAL – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. background details of investigation and appeal. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12) |
| 2. arguments presented by both parties. (Para 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33) |
| 3. court analysis of statutory provisions. (Para 34 , 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 , 44 , 45 , 46 , 47 , 48 , 49 , 50 , 51 , 52 , 53 , 54 , 55 , 56 , 57 , 58 , 59 , 60 , 61 , 62 , 63 , 64 , 65 , 66 , 67 , 68 , 69 , 70 , 71 , 72 , 73 , 74 , 75 , 76 , 77 , 78 , 79 , 80) |
| 4. legal principles concerning procedural compliance. (Para 81 , 82 , 83 , 84 , 85 , 86 , 87 , 88 , 89 , 90 , 91 , 92 , 93 , 94 , 95 , 96 , 97 , 98 , 99 , 100 , 101 , 102) |
BRIEF FACTS:
2. The Appellant registered ECIR No. 01/DZ-II/2017 dated 11.02.2017 pursuant to Criminal Complaint No. 57463 of 2016 dated 29.11.2016 filed by the Serious Fraud Investigation Office, SFIO under Section 420 read with Section 120B of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, IPC before the learned Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrate (Central) Special Acts, Tis Hazari Courts, Delhi.
4. Post the investigation, on a strong reasonable belief, that proceeds of crime, document
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
