Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
MR. JUSTICE SANJEEV NARULA, J
GURJIT SINGH – Appellant
Versus
NCB & ANR. – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. overview of bail application context and background. (Para 2) |
| 2. summary of applicant's defense claims. (Para 3) |
| 3. prosecution's arguments against bail. (Para 4) |
| 4. court assesses evidence against legal standards for granting bail under ndps. (Para 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10) |
| 5. court confirms statutory thresholds for bail under ndps act are not met. (Para 11 , 12 , 16 , 19 , 22) |
| 6. court concludes with dismissal of the bail application due to serious allegations. (Para 23 , 24) |
FACTS
2. The brief facts as emerging from the complaint are as under:
2.1. On 17th January, 2024, acting on specific information, a parcel booked through DHL Express, Rama Road, New Delhi, bearing AWB No. 5115949005 and destined for Adelaide, Australia, was examined. The search led to the recovery of 2.946 kg of a white crystalline substance, subsequently confirmed to be Methamphetamine, which was seized under a Panchnama prepared on the spot. Investigation revealed that the parcel had been booked on 16th January, 2024 through a Jaipur-based DTDC franchise. Follow-up action at Jaipur resulted in the interception of Mukesh Chouhan and Pinku Singh Rajput, who admitted their role in booking the consign
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
