Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV, J
SMT. POONAM – Appellant
Versus
SH. DHARMENDER – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. factual background regarding property ownership. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7) |
| 2. arguments on succession laws and claims. (Para 8 , 9) |
| 3. court's analytical framework for plaint evaluation. (Para 10 , 11 , 12 , 13) |
| 4. definitions of 'land' and 'holding' under dlr act. (Para 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18) |
| 5. jurisdictional implications of land classification. (Para 19 , 20 , 21 , 22) |
| 6. interpretation of section 50 dlr act. (Para 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34) |
| 7. effect of har naraini devi ruling on succession. (Para 36 , 37 , 38 , 39) |
| 8. civil court jurisdiction and dlr act applicability. (Para 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 , 44 , 45) |
| 9. clarification on residential land jurisdiction. (Para 46 , 47 , 48) |
| 10. maintaining suit as a whole under order vii rule 11. (Para 49 , 50 , 51 , 52 , 53) |
| 11. final observations before case listing. (Para 54 , 55 , 56 , 57 , 58 , 59) |
1. There are two applications filed under Order VII Rule 11 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (hereinafter referred to as “CPC”) - the first, I.A. 24756/2015, is filed by defendant Nos. 1 to 8; and the second, I.A. 38035/2024, is filed by defendant Nos 9 and 10. Both applications seek rejection of the p
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
