Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
PURUSHAINDRA KUMAR KAURAV, J
PANNA LAL OM PRAKASH AND CO. PVT. LTD – Appellant
Versus
MS. SHOBHA AGGARWAL – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. procedural applications filed by both parties. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. factual background of the agreement and default. (Para 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12) |
| 3. discovery application and the necessity of document production. (Para 13 , 14) |
| 4. arguments against plaintiff's delay and compliance. (Para 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 34) |
| 5. judicial principles regarding compliance with court orders. (Para 39 , 40 , 42 , 46) |
| 6. conditions for granting specific performance in law. (Para 41 , 54) |
| 7. conclusion on the dismissal of the suit. (Para 64 , 65) |
1. The application bearing I.A. 24801/2015 has been filed by the defendant no. 1 under Order XI Rule 21 read with Section 151 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (“CPC”), seeking dismissal of the suit for want of prosecution, on the ground that the plaintiff has failed to comply with the directions issued by this Court vide order dated 01.10.2011.
2. Application bearing I.A. 44681/2024 has been filed by the plaintiff, seeking leave to file the requisite documents as directed vide order dated 27.02.2024, thereby praying for the delay in compliance of the said order to be condoned.
3. In order to determine the instant applications
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
