Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KSHETARPAL, HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARISH VAIDYANATHAN SHANKAR, JJ
LATE SH PRAMOD KUMAR JAIN PROPRIETOR OF MS JAIN ENTERPRISES THROUGH HIS LEGAL HEIRS ORS & ORS. – Appellant
Versus
MUNICIPAL CORPORATION OF DELHI & ANR. – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. initiation of arbitration and contractual terms. (Para 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. background of contractual dispute (Para 5 , 6) |
| 3. formal grievance letters filed (Para 7 , 8 , 9 , 10) |
| 4. challenge to arbitration decisions (Para 11 , 12) |
| 5. contentions regarding the limitation of claims. (Para 13 , 14 , 15) |
| 6. arguments on limitation period (Para 16 , 17 , 18) |
| 7. acknowledgment and disputing amounts (Para 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23) |
| 8. respondents' defense on limitation (Para 24 , 25 , 26 , 27) |
| 9. court's analysis of claims (Para 28) |
| 10. court's reasoning on the demand and limitation commencement. (Para 29 , 30 , 31 , 32) |
| 11. court's reasoning on denial of claim (Para 33 , 34 , 35 , 36 , 37) |
| 12. limitations on claims under law (Para 38 , 39 , 40) |
| 13. implications of acknowledgment of liability (Para 41 , 42 , 43) |
| 14. court upholds initial findings (Para 44 , 45 , 46 , 47) |
| 15. rationale for limiting extension of claims (Para 48 , 49 , 50 , 51 , 52) |
| 16. final ruling on the case (Para 53 , 54) |
| 17. conclusion dismissing the appeal based on findings. (Para 55) |
2. The Arbitral Award dated 30.03.2012 4, passed by the learned Sole Arbitrator, was challenged by the Appellants by filing a petition under S
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
