Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
GIRISH KATHPALIA, J
BHANU CHAUDHARY – Appellant
Versus
GEETA RANI ALIAS GEETA BANSAL AND ORS – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner's acquisition of property leads to disputes. (Para 2 , 2) |
| 2. final judgment upholding trial court's decision. (Para 1) |
| 3. court ruled on valuation and declaration requirements for injunction. (Para 3 , 5 , 6) |
| 4. distinction in court fees related to type of relief sought. (Para 4) |
2. Briefly stated, the factual matrix pleaded by the petitioner/plaintiff before the trial court was as follows.
2.1 By way of Sale Deed dated 24.06.2021 for a total sale consideration of Rs.2,70,00,000/-, the petitioner/plaintiff purchased from the present respondents no.1 & 2 (defendants no.1 & 2 in the suit) portion C of premises bearing no. 144 E/1, Kilokari, Hari Nagar Ashram, near Jagan Nath Market, New Delhi (hereinafter referred to as “the suit property”) ad-measuring 350 sq. yards on stilt floor comprising temporarily covered portion, as depicted blue and yellow in the site plan annexed with the plaint. Earlier during the period from 2017 to 2019, the respondents/defendants no.1 & 2 had sold other flats at Tower-A in the said premises to respondents/ defendants no.3-6 by way of their individual Sale Deeds. The respondents/defendants no.1-6 even subsequent to purchase of t
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
