Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
NAVIN CHAWLA, MADHU JAIN, JJ
UNION OF INDIA AND ANR – Appellant
Versus
NEETA MISHRA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. challenge to the tribunal's order regarding acr disclosure and promotion claims. (Para 2 , 3) |
| 2. consideration of limitations in tribunal orders is crucial. (Para 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 3. court insists on exploring limitations before proceeding. (Para 7 , 8) |
| 4. case remanded to tribunal for proper consideration of limitations. (Para 9 , 10 , 11 , 12) |
2. This petition has been filed by the petitioners, challenging the Order dated 13.09.2022 passed by the learned Central Administrative Tribunal, Principal Bench, New Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the ‘Tribunal’) in O.A. No. 730/2017, titled Neeta Mishra v. Union of India and Anr., whereby the learned Tribunal disposed of the O.A. filed by the respondent herein with a direction to the petitioners to supply copies of the ACRs for the period 1987-1988 to 1992-1993 to the respondent. It was further directed that upon receipt of the copies of the ACRs, the respondent shall be at liberty to make a representation to the competent authority, which shall be obliged to take a decision on the said representation within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt thereof.
3. The respondent had filed the above O.A. stating therein tha
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
