Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
MANOJ KUMAR OHRI, J
MD. MURSHID – Appellant
Versus
STATE NCT OF DELHI – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. appeal against conviction based on pocso and ipc. (Para 2) |
| 2. court maintained the credibility of the victim's evidence. (Para 3 , 19) |
| 3. testimony of the minor victim connected the appellant to the crime. (Para 4 , 12) |
| 4. arguments challenging the identification and evidence were considered. (Para 5 , 6 , 15) |
| 5. evidence corroborating the victim's claims emphasizes the appellant's guilt in the matter. (Para 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 14 , 16) |
| 6. court assessed the application of presumptions and concluded on substantial evidence. (Para 17 , 18) |
2. The criminal investigation proceeded in the context of an incident that statedly occurred on 31.08.2013 at about 12.30 P.M. The first information about the incident came to be recorded through DD no.27A (Ex. PW11A) regarding commission of rape of a minor girl. FIR No. 327/2013 (Ex. PW4/A) under Sections 376/377/342 IPC came to be registered at PS. Jait Pur on the statement of the mother of the child victim, who stated that her daughter was playing in the gali when she heard her crying. She came outside the house to find the child victim weeping and saw blood on her left leg. On further probe, she found blood coming out of her anu
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
