Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
C. HARI SHANKAR, OM PRAKASH SHUKLA, JJ
MOHIT KUMAR – Appellant
Versus
SASHASTRA SEEMA BAL – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. probation can be extended but must adhere to regulatory limits. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. termination due to criminal proceedings must be substantiated properly. (Para 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 3. termination process and reasons clarify procedural violations. (Para 6 , 7 , 8) |
| 4. executive orders require justifiable reasons independent of external arguments. (Para 9 , 10 , 14) |
| 5. court's observations regarding the legality of the termination. (Para 11 , 12 , 13) |
| 6. corrective actions must be guided by laws and regulations. (Para 15) |
| 7. final ruling and implications for reinstatement. (Para 16) |
“3(i) He/She will be on probation for two years from the date of his/her appointment in SSB, which may be extended or curtailed at the discretion of the competent authority as prescribed under SSB Rules but the total period of extension of probation shall not, except where it is necessary, by reasons of any departmental or legal proceedings pending against him/her, exceed two years. During the period of probation, he/she may be required to undergo such training and to pass such tests as the Department may prescribe from time to time.”
2. Thus, the petitioner was on probation for two years. The probation per
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
