Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
TEJAS KARIA, J
SANDVIK INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY AB – Appellant
Versus
BHANWAR LAL DHABHAI AND ORS. – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. plaintiff's company history and trademark utilization are established. (Para 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 2. plaintiff established trademark ownership and historical presence. (Para 10) |
| 3. defendant's unauthorized use of the impugned marks and deceptive behavior highlighted. (Para 12 , 13 , 14 , 15) |
| 4. court confirms trademark infringement due to similarity and absence of defense. (Para 23 , 24 , 25 , 27) |
| 5. ruling allows for declaration of well-known trademarks pending further procedure. (Para 29) |
| 6. court decrees suit, awarding damages and injunction against defendant. (Para 30) |
2. The Plaintiff has filed the present Suit for a decree of permanent injunction restraining infringement of its Trade Mark, passing off, dilution, damages, rendition of accounts, delivery up, etc.
SUBMISSIONS ON BEHALF OF THE PLAINTIFF:
3. Mr. Urfee Roomi, the learned Counsel for the Plaintiff submitted that the Plaintiff, Sandvik Intellectual Property AB, is an intellectual property holding Company that is organised and existing under the laws of Sweden. The Plaintiff is part of the renowned group of Sandvik Group of Companies (“Plaintiff Group of Companies”).
4. The learned Counsel for the Plaintiff submitted
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
