2. Mr. Saxena, learned senior counsel fairly admitted that the subject plot of land for the purpose of Ramleela had been allotted to respondent no.2 for the years 2023 and 2024. Despite having been allotted, respondent no.2 did not organise any Ramleela function in the year 2023. He contends that mere booking or allotment would not be enough and as per clause (2) of the SOP, the intending allottee is required to show evidence of the Ramleela function having been organised in 2 years out of the last 3 years. His contention is that since even as per the DCP order dated 01.09.2025, “No stage Ramlila was conducted during the year 2023 at the said ground”, the respondent no.2 cannot be stated to have held the Ramleela function at the subject site/plot.

3. On the basis of the aforesaid contention, learned senior counsel states that cancellation of booking of the appellant by the respondent no.1/DDA is unilateral and granting allotment of the same plot of land to the respondent no.2 in the afor