SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Del) 7127

IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
THE PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX - INTERNATIONAL TAXATION -3 – Appellant
Versus
SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO. LTD. – Respondent
ITA-1029/2018



* IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI

% Judgment reserved on: 09 January 2025

Judgment pronounced on: 15 January, 2025

+ ITA 1029/2018

THE PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX - INTERNATIONAL TAXATION -3 .....Appellant

Through: Mr. Sanjay Kumar, SSC with Ms. Monica Benjamin and Ms. Easha Kadian, JSCs.

versus

SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO. LTD. .....Respondent

Through: Mr. Himanshu S. Sinha, Mr. Prashant Meharchandani, Mr. Jainender Singh Kataria & Ms. Kanika Jain, Advs.

+ ITA 1058/2018

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX - INTERNATIONAL TAXATION -3 .....Appellant

Through: Mr. Sanjay Kumar, SSC with Ms. Monica Benjamin and Ms. Easha Kadian, JSCs.

versus

SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO. LTD. .....Respondent

Through: Mr. Himanshu S. Sinha, Mr. Prashant Meharchandani, Mr. Jainender Singh Kataria & Ms. Kanika Jain, Advs.

+ ITA 1060/2018

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX - INTERNATIONAL TAXATION -3 .....Appellant

Through: Mr. Sanjay Kumar, SSC with Ms. Monica Benjamin and Ms. Easha Kadian, JSCs.

versus

SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO. LTD .....Respondent

Through: Mr. Himanshu S. Sinha, Mr. Prashant Meharchandani, Mr. Jainender Singh Kataria & Ms. Kanika Jain, Advs.

+ ITA 1065/2018

THE PR. COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX - INTERNATIONAL TAXATION -3 .....Appellant

Through: Mr. Sanjay Kumar, SSC with Ms. Monica Benjamin and Ms. Easha Kadian, JSCs.

versus

SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO. LTD .....Respondent

Through: Mr. Himanshu S. Sinha, Mr. Prashant Meharchandani, Mr. Jainender Singh Kataria & Ms. Kanika Jain, Advs.

+ ITA 1066/2018

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX - INTERNATIONAL TAXATION -3 .....Appellant

Through: Mr. Sanjay Kumar, SSC with Ms. Monica Benjamin and Ms. Easha Kadian, JSCs.

versus

SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO. LTD. .....Respondent

Through: Mr. Himanshu S. Sinha, Mr. Prashant Meharchandani, Mr. Jainender Singh Kataria & Ms. Kanika Jain, Advs.

+ ITA 1099/2018

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX - INTERNATIONAL TAXATION -3 .....Appellant

Through: Mr. Sanjay Kumar, SSC with Ms. Monica Benjamin and Ms. Easha Kadian, JSCs.

versus

SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO. LTD. .....Respondent

Through: Mr. Himanshu S. Sinha, Mr. Prashant Meharchandani, Mr. Jainender Singh Kataria & Ms. Kanika Jain, Advs.

+ ITA 604/2019

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX - INTERNATIONAL TAXATION -3 .....Appellant

Through: Mr. Ruchir Bhatia, SSC with Mr. Anant Mann, JSC.

versus

SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO. LTD. .....Respondent

Through: Mr. Himanshu S. Sinha, Mr. Prashant Meharchandani, Mr. Jainender Singh Kataria & Ms. Kanika Jain, Advs.

+ ITA 625/2019

THE COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX - INTERNATIONAL TAXATION -3 .....Appellant

Through: Mr. Ruchir Bhatia, SSC with Mr. Anant Mann, JSC.

versus

SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO. LTD. .....Respondent

Through: Mr. Himanshu S. Sinha, Mr. Prashant Meharchandani, Mr. Jainender Singh Kataria & Ms. Kanika Jain, Advs.

+ ITA 289/2023

COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (INTERNATIONAL TAXATION)-3 .....Appellant

Through: Mr. Ruchir Bhatia, SSC with Mr. Anant Mann, JSC.

versus

SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO. LTD. .....Respondent

Through: Mr. Himanshu S. Sinha, Mr. Prashant Meharchandani, Mr. Jainender Singh Kataria & Ms. Kanika Jain, Advs.

CORAM:

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE YASHWANT VARMA

HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARISH VAIDYANATHAN

SHANKAR

J U D G M E N T

YASHWANT VARMA, J.

1. The Commissioner of Income Tax (International Taxation) in this batch of appeals impugns the order of 22 March 2018 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal1 and which had been followed by the Tribunal in its orders dated 14 December 2018 and 22 March 2021, pursuant to which composite appeals preferred by the respondent-assessee Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd.2 and pertaining to Assessment Years3 2007-08 to 2009-10, 2011-12 to 2015-16 and 2017-18 came to be allowed.

2. ITAs 604/2019, 625/2019 and 289/2023 which are connected with the lead appeal, ITA 1029/2018, pertain to AYs 2013-14, 2015-16 and 2017-18 respectively, in which the view as expressed by the Tribunal

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top