Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
ANIL KSHETARPAL, HARISH VAIDYANATHAN SHANKAR, JJ
AJMERA RAMULU – Appellant
Versus
B CHANDRAKALA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. appellant contests marriage validity based on customary community rites. (Para 1 , 3 , 8) |
| 2. both parties provided conflicting narratives regarding the nature of their marriage. (Para 5 , 9 , 10) |
| 3. determination that marriage validity requires adherence to hindu ceremonies. (Para 30 , 32 , 34) |
1. Through the present Appeal filed under Section 19 of The Family Courts Act, 1984 [hereinafter referred to as ‘the Act’], the Appellant assails the correctness of the judgment dated 09.02.2024 [hereinafter referred to as ‘Impugned Judgment’] passed by the learned Family Court.
2. The Appellant preferred an application under Order VII Rule 11 CPC, seeking rejection of the Respondent’s petition under Section 13(1)(i)(b) of the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955 [hereinafter referred to as ‘ HMA ’], contending that the proceedings were not maintainable in view of the statutory exclusion contained in Section 2 (2) of the HMA .
BRIEF FACTUAL MATRIX:
3. In order to comprehend the issues involved in the present case, the relevant facts, in brief, are required to be noticed.
4. The Appellant/Husband is employed as an Assistant Executive Engineer in the Irrigation Department
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
