Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
MS. PRATHIBA M. SINGH, MR. AMIT SHARMA, JJ
ABID – Appellant
Versus
STATE (NCT OF DELHI) – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. conviction under sections of ipc and arms act. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. factual background leading to murder. (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 3. arguments challenging witness credibility. (Para 7 , 8 , 9) |
| 4. failure to prove motive and discrepancies. (Para 10 , 11 , 12 , 13) |
| 5. court's views on evidence and credibility. (Para 14 , 15 , 16) |
| 6. presence and roles of accused established. (Para 17 , 18 , 19) |
| 7. nature of injuries reflects assault intent. (Para 20 , 21 , 22) |
| 8. common object of unlawful assembly established. (Para 23 , 24 , 25) |
| 9. court's analysis of statements from witnesses. (Para 26 , 27 , 28) |
| 10. final judgment and conclusion on liability. (Para 29 , 30 , 31) |
AMIT SHARMA, J.
1. The present appeals under Section 374 (2) of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (for short, ‘CrPC’) have been filed assailing the common impugned judgment of conviction dated 20.09.2022 and order on sentence dated 19.11.2022 passed by learned Special Judge (PC Act) (CBI)-12, Rouse Avenue Court Complex, Delhi, whereby the present Appellants/Convicts have been convicted in Sessions Case No. 422/2016 arising out of FIR No.101/2013, under Sections 148 /149/449/302/427/506(2)/307/323/34 of the India
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
