IN THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI AT NEW DELHI
NAVIN CHAWLA, MADHU JAIN, JJ
MUNNA LAL YADAV – Appellant
Versus
DEPARTMENT OF EMPOWERMENT OF PERSONS WITH DISABILITIES & ORS. – Respondent
1. This petition has been filed praying for the following reliefs:
“a. Hold and declare Rule 16 of the SBI Officers Services Rules, 1992 as illegal and unconstitutional to the extent that it treats PwDs at par with the general candidates;
b. Hold and declare Rule 16 of the SBI Officers Services Rules, illegal and unconstitutional for being arbitrary, vague and being discretionary in nature;
c. Hold and declare Rule 16 of the SBI Officers Services Rules, unconstitutional for being violative of Articles 14, 16, 19 and 21 of the Constitution;
d. Hold and declare ‘right to access to opportunity’ as an essential and integral right part of Article 21 of the Constitution of India;
e. Set-aside the termination of the Petitioner by quashing the Termination Letter dated 2nd May 2018 as issued by the Respondent No. 3 for being violative of Articles 14, 16, 19(1)(g) and 21 of the Constitution and reinstate the Petitioner with all benefits and arrears of payment; OR
f. Issue a writ of mandamus to the Respondent No. 3 and 4 thereby directing them to identify and reserve in terms of Sections 3 3 and 34 of the RPwD Act a minimum of 4% of total number of vacancies of the cadre strength
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.